Management Innovation and new technology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Management Innovation and new-sprung(prenominal) technology - Essay ExampleThe construct of innovation is as old as the history of earth as men have always tried to improve things in their surroundings for the comfort and ease. However, from the history of world businesses, we rear see that in the run towards an innovated harvest companies often lead towards customer frustration and dissatisfaction resulting in lower sales and disadvantage of customer trust. There are various examples in the past where companies define the ultimate objective to engulf an innovative product and did non give much thought to the process and necessity of it. This lack of catch of product innovation becomes one of the major reasons of product sales downfall (Light Minds Ltd, 2005). Many economists believe that with the increase business competition, managers and executives often overestimate the need of their consumers. A new and innovative product is often to a greater extent complex to use and more expensive (Gottfredson & Aspinall, 2005). Advancement in a product line needfully better machineries and plentiful of companys resources which eventually the consumer has to bear. Often the advancement made by companies is near to give the feeling of new and is not as per the need of the customer (Rosenthal, 2099). The recent example of Facebook Timeline is pertinent to highlight in this regard. It was introduced to give a new and fresh look to the users so to increase the conviction they spend on Facebook. Result shows that the objective was merely achieved as it increases the complexity of the product (Choney, 2011). Therefore, keeping the billet of consumers is a key element in the success of product innovation process (Light Minds Ltd, 2005). Case ruminate of 3M The case of 3Ms Post-it Notes can be analyzed to on the noseify that product innovation is not just a one-off event, but a complex organization process. The idea of adhesive notepad seemed great initially, b ut it saturnine out to be a below average invention, which the consumer kept daunting for years. The notepad went through several stages of innovation each time the company offering something new in the product but failing to succumb a massive sale every time (Nayak & Ketteringha, 1994). The issue was not meeting with the customers need and innovating, what might be better but not the requirement. This explains the core concept behind product innovation. Another lacking in the product was in its limited usage. People did not feel the need of having an adhesive bulletin board rather than a simple board. This brought the executives of 3M to the conclusion that this product has no prox in the market (Nayak & Ketteringha, 1994). It was at this crucial time that one of the executives of the company, Spencer Silver, thought that the sticky pad can be given another try to make it more viable for peoples use. As product innovation is a summed product of the facts of previous sales and co nsumers demand, he carried a decent enquiry to find the ways to optimize the use of the adhesive notepad. He explored the marvelous concept that an innovation does not always need to be complicated it can come through simple means too. He used the same ingredients that were used in the notepads, but with different proportions and combinations, out of which one gave a new result. The learned people around and scientists were all conservative with their approach. Their thinking phenomenon was restricted by their knowledge of chemical properties and reactions of ingredients. However,